(Ref: Para.4)

Litigation and claims involving the entity may have a material effect on the financial report and thus may be required to be disclosed or accounted for in the financial report.

It is the responsibility of those charged with governance of an entity to adopt policies and procedures to identify, evaluate, record and report on the outcome of any material litigation and claims.  However, since the factors that would be considered in the accounting for and reporting of litigation and claims are within the direct knowledge and control of the management of an entity, management is the primary source of information.  Ordinarily, the auditor would seek audit evidence from different sources to corroborate management’s assertions.

In addition to the procedures identified in paragraph 4, other relevant procedures include, for example, using information obtained through risk assessment procedures carried out as part of obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment to assist the auditor to become aware of litigation and claims involving the entity.

The procedures identified in paragraphs 4 and A2 would ordinarily include the following:

• reviewing and discussing with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for identifying and recording litigation and claims and bringing them to the attention of management;
• reviewing and discussing with management the procedures within the entity’s internal control structure for the identification, control and recording of litigation and claims and associated revenues and expenses in appropriate accounts; and
• obtaining and discussing with management:
  1. a list of litigation and claims, including a description of the matters and an estimate of their likely financial consequences; and
  2. an analysis identifying litigation and claims.

Audit procedures that are undertaken for different purposes might also identify litigation and claims.  Such procedures include:

• examining contracts, loan agreements, leases, insurance policies and claims, and other correspondence;
• reading minutes of meetings of the audit committee, shareholders and appropriate committees;
• obtaining information concerning guarantees from bank confirmations; and
• enquiries of management and other employees of the entity.

Audit evidence obtained for purposes of identifying litigation and claims that may give rise to a risk of material misstatement also may provide audit evidence regarding other relevant considerations, such as valuation or measurement, regarding litigation and claims.  ASA 540^* establishes requirements and provides guidance relevant to the auditor’s consideration of litigation and claims requiring accounting estimates or related disclosures in the financial report.

Reviewing Legal Expense Accounts (Ref: Para. 4(c))

Depending on the circumstances, the auditor may judge it appropriate to examine related source documents, such as invoices for legal expenses, as part of the auditor’s review of legal expense accounts. 

Outcome of Litigation and Claims (Ref: Para. 4)

The procedures outlined in paragraphs A1‑A4 are methods whereby the auditor can identify both material litigation and claims and legal counsel who have been consulted by the entity.  However, these procedures may not necessarily provide the auditor with sufficient appropriate audit evidence concerning the likely outcome of litigation and claims.  Furthermore, the auditor ordinarily does not possess the skills necessary and is not in a position to make legal judgements concerning the likely outcome of litigation and claims. 

(Ref: Para.5-6)

External Legal Counsel (Ref: Para. 5)

Direct communication with the entity’s external legal counsel assists the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to whether potentially material litigation and claims are known and management’s estimates of the financial implications, including costs, are reasonable. 

In some cases, the auditor may seek direct communication with the entity’s external legal counsel through a letter of general enquiry.  For this purpose, a letter of general enquiry requests the entity’s external legal counsel to inform the auditor of any litigation and claims that the counsel is aware of, together with an assessment of the outcome of the litigation and claims, and an estimate of the financial implications, including costs involved.

If it is considered unlikely that the entity’s external legal counsel will respond appropriately to a letter of general enquiry, for example if the professional body to which the external legal counsel belongs prohibits response to such a letter, the auditor may seek direct communication through a letter of specific enquiry.  For this purpose, a letter of specific enquiry includes:

1. A list of litigation and claims;
2. Where available, management’s assessment of the outcome of each of the identified litigation and claims and its estimate of the financial implications, including costs involved; and
3. A request that the entity’s external legal counsel confirm the reasonableness of management’s assessments and provide the auditor with further information if the list is considered by the entity’s external legal counsel to be incomplete or incorrect.

An example of a letter of specific enquiry is included in [Aus] Appendix 1.

An auditor may in some cases request that management send a letter of enquiry to the entity’s legal counsel who are not identified as currently handling the entity’s litigation and claims.  For example when the entity has changed legal counsel on a particular matter, or when legal counsel engaged by the entity has resigned, the auditor would consider the need for enquiries concerning the reasons for the change or resignation. 

In certain circumstances, the auditor also may judge it necessary to meet with the entity’s external legal counsel to discuss the likely outcome of the litigation or claims.  This may be the case, for example, where:

• The auditor determines that the matter is a significant risk.
• The matter is complex.
• There is disagreement between management and the entity’s external legal counsel. 

Ordinarily, such meetings require management’s permission and are held with a representative of management in attendance.

In‑house and/or External Legal Counsel (Ref: Para. Aus 5.1)

If both in‑house and external legal counsel are involved in advising the entity on the same litigation and claims, the auditor would ordinarily seek a letter of enquiry from the legal counsel with the primary responsibility for that matter.  However, there may be circumstances where the in‑house legal counsel has primary responsibility, but the matter has involved substantial participation by an external legal counsel, and is of such significance that the auditor would consider obtaining a letter of enquiry from the external legal counsel to determine that their opinion does not differ materially from that of the in‑house legal counsel.

In circumstances where both in‑house and external legal counsel have devoted substantial attention to litigation and claims involving the entity and primary responsibility rests with the external legal counsel, evidence obtained from an in‑house legal counsel is not an adequate substitute for any information that the external legal counsel may refuse to furnish.

Legal Counsel’s Response

Before relying on the opinion of either in‑house legal counsel or external legal counsel, care should be exercised to ensure that conditions prevail which would make such reliance reasonable.^*

If a disagreement between management and legal counsel is resolved after discussions, the auditor would ordinarily request the entity’s legal counsel to confirm the details in writing to the auditor.  (Ref: Para. Aus 5.2)

If the disagreement is not resolved, the auditor would ordinarily prepare a memorandum of the discussion and seek written confirmation from management and the entity’s legal counsel that it is an accurate record of the discussion.  In conjunction with evidence from other audit procedures, the auditor, under ASA 705, needs to consider the effect of such disagreement on the auditor’s report. 

If the response from the entity’s legal counsel contains information that requires clarification, the auditor would ordinarily make further enquiries of management and the entity’s legal counsel, as appropriate, and request clarification in writing. 

Legal Counsel’s Inability to Respond Comprehensively or Limitations in a Response (Ref: Para. 6(a))

If a response is not received from the entity’s legal counsel, or the response received is incomplete, the auditor would ordinarily consider:

1. requesting management to contact the entity’s legal counsel to either seek a complete answer to the original request, or an explanation for the lack of, or limitation in, a response, which ought to be sent directly to the auditor; or
2. making arrangements to discuss with management or the entity’s legal counsel the reasons for the lack of, or limitation in, a response.

Due to the following circumstances it may be difficult to either obtain a response to a letter of enquiry or be provided with information about litigation and claims from the entity’s legal counsel:

1. If the entity is involved in litigation, or litigation is anticipated or contemplated, relevant information about legal matters may be subject to legal professional privilege.  Disclosure of this information in the letter of enquiry, directly to the auditor for the purposes of the audit of the entity’s financial report, is not privileged.  This may cause legal professional privilege attaching to the entity’s communications with its legal counsel to be compromised, as information in the letter of enquiry might become discoverable in litigation proceedings.
2. Factors influencing the outcome of a legal matter may sometimes not be within the legal counsel’s competence to judge, for example where there is no relevant or historical experience of the entity or other entities in similar matters, or where the litigation is at an early stage.
3. Due to material uncertainties, the entity’s legal counsel may be unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’s representations regarding outstanding litigation and claims.

Alternative Audit Procedures (Ref: Para. 6(b))

Where the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence as to a material financial report assertion regarding litigation and claims, under ASA 330, the auditor needs to consider whether alternative audit procedures can provide further audit evidence.  Alternative audit procedures may include:

1. further enquiries of management or those charged with governance, about for instance the processes, procedures and assumptions they implement, adopt or make to ensure litigation and claims are recognised and disclosed in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;
2. where possible, making arrangements to discuss litigation and claims with management and the entity’s legal counsel;
3. further review of documents in management’s possession concerning litigation and claims, including the entity’s board minutes; and
4. further examination of accounts rendered by the entity’s external legal counsel.

The auditor may also consider any relevant legislation to assist in obtaining information about litigation and claims, including, for example:

• Section 310 of the Corporations Act 2001 which entitles the auditor to a right of access at all reasonable times to the books of a company, registered scheme or disclosing entity, and to require from any officer information, explanations or other assistance for the purposes of the audit or review. 
• When the entity is a disclosing entity, whether disclosure of any litigation and claims has been made in accordance with the continuous disclosure requirements under sections 674 or 675 of the Corporations Act 2001.

Other Audit Reporting Considerations (Ref: Para. 6)

In those circumstances where, due to uncertainties, the entity’s legal counsel is unable to form a conclusion to corroborate management’s representation, the auditor needs to consider the effect on the auditor’s report arising from the extent of disclosure of the uncertainty in the financial report: 

1. where the auditor considers that the disclosure of the uncertainty in the financial report is adequate, the auditor needs to consider including an Emphasis of Matter paragraph; in accordance with ASA 706,* or
2. if in the auditor’s opinion the disclosure of the uncertainty is inadequate or unreliable, a modified opinion needs to be expressed in accordance with ASA 705. 

(Ref: Para.7)

ASA 580^# deals with the auditor’s responsibility to obtain written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, in an audit of a financial report.  Appendix 2 of that Standard provides an illustrative example of a representation letter.

As management is the primary source of information regarding litigation and claims, the auditor is required to request management to provide written representations about such matters.  Written representations from management provide audit evidence regarding litigation and claims that may have a material effect on the financial report.

(Ref: Para. Aus 7.1-Aus 7.2)

In accordance with ASA 700,^† the auditor is required to date the auditor’s report no earlier than the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the auditor’s opinion on the financial report.  Audit evidence about the status of litigation and claims up to the date of the auditor’s report may be obtained by enquiry of management, including in‑house legal counsel, responsible for dealing with the relevant matters.  In some instances, the auditor may need to obtain updated information from the entity’s external legal counsel.

When new litigation or claims, which may have a material effect on the financial report, have been referred to the entity’s legal counsel subsequent to sending the letter of enquiry to the entity’s legal counsel and prior to signing the auditor’s report, the auditor would ordinarily request management to prepare an additional letter of enquiry to the legal counsel regarding the new litigation or claims. 

When litigation and claims matters, which may have a material effect on the financial report, are discovered, which were not previously identified by management, the auditor would ordinarily inform management and request management to address further enquiries to, or arrange a meeting with, the entity’s legal counsel or other relevant experts, at which the auditor would be present.  In addition, the auditor needs to extend the auditor’s audit procedures to ensure that sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to form an opinion has been obtained.  If, however, having regard to all the circumstances, the auditor is unable to obtain satisfaction that all the information required for the purposes of the audit has been received, the auditor considers the effect on the auditor’s report.^*

If information comes to the auditor’s attention that may indicate the existence of material liabilities resulting from litigation and claims on which management has not sought advice, the auditor ordinarily discusses the matter with those charged with governance.  Depending on the circumstances, refusal by management to seek advice may be considered to be a limitation in the scope of the auditor’s work.