31386 paragraphs found
When more persuasive audit evidence is needed regarding the effectiveness of a control, it may be appropriate to increase the extent of testing of the control. As well as the degree of reliance on controls, matters the auditor may consider in determining …
Because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, it may not be necessary to increase the extent of testing of an automated control. An automated control can be expected to function consistently unless the program (including the tables, files, or …
In some circumstances, it may be necessary to obtain audit evidence supporting the effective operation of indirect controls. For example, when the auditor decides to test the effectiveness of a user review of exception reports detailing sales in excess …
Because of the inherent consistency of IT processing, audit evidence about the implementation of an automated application control, when considered in combination with audit evidence about the operating effectiveness of the entity’s general controls (in …
Timing of Tests of Controls Intended period of reliance (Ref: Para. 11) …
Audit evidence pertaining only to a point in time may be sufficient for the auditor’s purpose, for example, when testing controls over the entity’s physical inventory counting at the period end. If, on the other hand, the auditor intends to rely on a …
Using audit evidence obtained during an interim period (Ref: Para. 12(b)) …
Relevant factors in determining what additional audit evidence to obtain about controls that were operating during the period remaining after an interim period, include: The significance of the assessed risks of material misstatement at the assertion …
Additional audit evidence may be obtained, for example, by extending tests of controls over the remaining period or testing the entity’s monitoring of …