152 paragraphs found
Evaluating the design of a control involves considering whether the control, individually or in combination with other controls, is capable of effectively preventing, or detecting and correcting, material variations. Implementation of a control means …
Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of evidence. Appropriateness is the measure of the quality of evidence; that is, its relevance and its reliability. The assurance practitioner ordinarily considers the relationship between the cost of obtaining …
Performance engagements require the application of assurance skills and techniques and the gathering of sufficient appropriate evidence as part of an iterative, systematic assurance engagement process. For further guidance on the nature, timing and …
In a performance engagement if the assurance practitioner becomes aware of a matter that leads the assurance practitioner to question whether sufficient appropriate evidence has been obtained, the assurance practitioner ordinarily pursues the matter by …
If the performance engagement is initiated by the assurance practitioner, the assurance practitioner may not be in a position to obtain representations from the responsible party, particularly as the responsible party may not be a party to the performance …
Representations by the responsible party cannot replace other evidence the assurance practitioner could reasonably expect to be available. An inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence regarding a matter that has, or may have, a material effect …
Written representations may include that the responsible party: acknowledges its responsibility for conducting the activity, intended to achieve a certain level of performance; has provided the assurance practitioner with all relevant information and …
The assurance practitioner needs to consider the impact of material variations in the performance of the activity when evaluated against the identified criteria, on the conclusions in the assurance report. A variation is material when, in the assurance …
The extent of consideration of subsequent events that come to the attention of the assurance practitioner depends on the potential for such events to affect the activity and to affect the appropriateness of the assurance practitioner’s conclusions. …
The assurance practitioner does not have any responsibility to perform procedures or make any enquiry after the date of the report. If however, after the date of the report, the assurance practitioner becomes aware of a matter identified, the assurance …